HSP
  • Home
  • Contact us
  • Community
  • E-newsletter
  • Events
  • Take a free trial
  • Subscribe
  • Health
    • Asbestos
    • Chemicals (and COSHH)
    • Disability Discrimination Act
    • Ergonomics
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Noise
    • Sickness absence
    • Stress/bullying
  • Safety
    • Directors' duties
    • Fire
    • HSE
    • Manual handling
    • Noise
    • Personal protective equipment (PPE)
    • Risk assessment
    • Road safety
    • Work at height
  • Professional Skills
    • Ask the recruitment expert
    • Management skills
    • Qualifications
    • Training
    • Training guides
  • Industry
    • Catering and leisure
    • Chemicals
    • Construction
    • Public services
    • Retail and distribution
  • Sign In
Sustainability first

09 November 2007
Louis Wustemann
Add a comment


More than 200 delegates from 25 countries gathered at the 2007 DuPont World Leaders Forum in Geneva on 12 October to try to redress the balance by debating the theme of safety's place in corporate sustainability. Louis Wustemann reports.

Though most organisations above a certain size now include some workforce safety data in their corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, there has been little debate about the role that safety specialists can play in improving business and product sustainability and minimising adverse business impacts.

DuPont's vice president of safety and protection Mark Vergnano opened proceedings with the proposition that key trends influencing business attitudes to safety and sustainability were a growing public desire to feel secure from harm, especially in the light of terrorist threats, an expectation of more corporate responsibility and a much greater scepticism about the inherent goodness of big business.

In a panel session, Claus Conzelmann, vice president for safety, health and environment at food group Nestlé, suggested that extending your own organisation's safety competence and standards out into the supply chain was one way to take product stewardship beyond simply environmental impacts. In Nestlé's own case, he gave the example of milk transportation, explaining the group is the world's biggest milk buyer and outsources most of its logistics, especially in the developing world.

"In some of these areas people don't even have driving licences, or if they do, they are bought on the black market," Conzelmann noted. He said the company is now helping provide safe driving programmes in such countries, and seeing a positive impact on road accident figures in its logistics chain.

Jukka Takala, director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, added the example of the furniture chain Ikea working with Chinese manufacturers to improve the guarding on woodworking machines.

In a break-out session, David Wilkinson, director of environment, health and safety at Alcan Packaging Food Europe, talked delegates through a system that aims to quantify the workplace safety risks associated with any product as part of a "stewardship tool" that profiles the impacts of any piece of Alcan packaging. Products are assessed under economic, environmental and social headings (measured against low-impact benchmark products), with the latter accounting for the health and safety risks associated with making it and the strength of the health and safety system at the relevant plant.

The profile is presented as a table with colour-coded measures so that Alcan can see at a glance which products are associated with safety "hotspots" and its customers can judge their overall sustainability. Wilkinson said this transparency carried the risk that customers wouldn't always like what they saw, but added "if a tool never gave negative answers it wouldn't be worth using it."

Back at the plenary sessions, Jukka Takala lamented workplace safety's staid image, noting it was hard to imagine the Nobel committee awarding the peace prize, recently given to Al Gore for his environmental work, to a safety campaigner.


Powerful prizes

Energy companies almost swept the board at DuPont's sixth annual safety awards, handed out at the safety and sustainability forum. Utilities won three of the five prizes and an oil producer landed a fourth. The winners were:

  • ScottishPower Energy Networks, for its Powerwise project to educate children about risks from electricity distribution plant. The company has reached 129,000 school children in three years through a mixture of primary school visits, resource packs tailored to the national science curriculum and an interactive website. ScottishPower's health and safety development manager, Andrew Sharman, said the project's payback for the company was a decrease in vandalism to its equipment and thefts of copper from substations, which had risen with the escalating price of scrap metal.

     

  • E.ON Benelux for a programme called Going for Safety Excellence which has raised standards since 2002 by testing contractors on their safety competence and installing surveillance equipment in enclosed and high-risk areas, plus various safety-awareness initiatives. The chief executive for E.ON's lowlands operation said the proof of the pudding had been in the the fact they had managed two six-month shutdowns of major power plants, with the help of up to 1,500 contractor staff, without a single lost-time accident.

The Swiss Addax Petroleum Corporation won with a programme to protect its staff in West Africa and Kurdistan by engaging with local communities, rather than the traditional response of simply beefing up security. Spanish electricity utility Endesa was rewarded for cutting its accident frequency rate by 40% since 2004 and Portuguese shopping mall operator Sonae Sierra for a behavioural safety scheme designed to help the firm work towards its zero-accident target.


 

 


Categories:
Management skills, Qualifications, Training, Safety, Article, Training
Bookmark this article with:

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
 
  • Log in to view and post comments
  • Printer-friendly version


Five steps debate

Duncan Spencer's recent article in HSW questioning the utility of the HSE's five steps to risk assessment method has prompted a discussion between Spencer and consultant John Anderson.

Read the debate and add your comments >>

Latest comments


Fines: profit over insurance

A day with the HSE

Should there be a register for consultants?

Isn't this what COSHH legislation is in place for?

One-in-three back pain sufferers blames work

Lord Young's safety review

Latest in the blog


Busman's holiday >>

The not-so-perfect CV >>

How to divine the significant from the
trivial >>

Britain v Germany...again >>

Do not touch! >>

Mastering the art of relaxation >>

Forthcoming events


15-16 September: Health and Safety '10 – Scotland

22 September: FLTA Safety Conference


13-14 October: Health and Safety ’10 – North

4 November: HSW/IIRSM conference 2010

See all >>

Ask a recruitment expert


I'm currently working in the UK. How do I go about securing work in the Middle East?

This is a common question, though the answer today is very different to the answer 18 months or two years ago... read more

My employer is prepared to support my professional development. I’m already CMIOSH and MIIRSM, what should I do next?

Firstly, congratulations. The fact your current company is prepared to support you beyond... read more

I've been made redundant. What else can I do to find a job?

Unfortunately, as you'll no doubt appreciate, there are lots of people in your position at the moment. There are fewer... read more

Click here for tips on how to write a
winning CV >>

Links


1st Degree-level course directory

Industry case studies

Products and services

Find your next job here

HSW on Facebook

HSW on Twitter

Lawyerlocator.com
Search For A Lawyer by town:

Powered by Lawyer Locator
Ask a question or post an answer >>


Follow healthandsafety on Twitter
Follow HSW on Facebook
  • Read current issue
  • Contact us
  • Subscribe
What do you think?










Health
Asbestos
Chemicals (and COSHH)
Disability Discrimination Act
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal disorders
Noise
Sickness absence
Stress/bullying
Vibration
Asthma
Display Screen Equipment (DSE)
Drugs and alcohol
Risk assessment
Legionnaire's disease
Accident reduction
Enforcement (prosecutions)
Mental health
New and expectant mothers
Older workers
Safe systems of work
Smoking
Safety
Directors' duties
Fire
HSE
Manual handling
Noise
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Risk assessment
Road safety
Work at height
Electrical safety
Lifting operations
Safe systems of work
Chemicals (and COSHH)
Corporate manslaughter
Migrant workers
Regulation
Asbestos
Confined spaces
Accident reduction
Worker involvement / representation
Violence at work
Workplace transport
Slips, trips, and falls
Work equipment
New and expectant mothers
Training
Insurance
Emergency planning
Lone workers
Enforcement (prosecutions)
First aid
Drugs and alcohol
Accident reporting / RIDDOR
Young workers
Professional Skills
Ask the recruitment expert
Management skills
Qualifications
Training
Training guides
Industry
Catering and leisure
Chemicals
Construction
Public services
Retail and distribution
Transport
Utilities
Financial / general services
Manufacturing / engineering

Halsbury House, 35 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1EL
Customer Services 0845 370 1234

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Reprint and Syndication
  • © Lexis Nexis. All Rights Reserved.

  • Partner sites:   LexisNexis
  • Magazines and Journals
  • Conferences and Training
  • Supplier Directory
  • Taxation Jobs
  • Taxation
  • Criminal Law & Justice
  • Legal Jobs
  • Company Law Forum
  • Health and Safety
  • Health and Safety Jobs
  • Environment in Business
  • Green & Environment Jobs
  • Payrolls & Pension Jobs
  • Employment Law Forum
  • www.newlaw-directories.co.uk