HSP
  • Home
  • Contact us
  • Community
  • E-newsletter
  • Events
  • Take a free trial
  • Subscribe
  • Health
    • Asbestos
    • Chemicals (and COSHH)
    • Disability Discrimination Act
    • Ergonomics
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Noise
    • Sickness absence
    • Stress/bullying
  • Safety
    • Directors' duties
    • Fire
    • HSE
    • Manual handling
    • Noise
    • Personal protective equipment (PPE)
    • Risk assessment
    • Road safety
    • Work at height
  • Professional Skills
    • Ask the recruitment expert
    • Management skills
    • Qualifications
    • Training
    • Training guides
  • Industry
    • Catering and leisure
    • Chemicals
    • Construction
    • Public services
    • Retail and distribution
  • Sign In
Rescue planning for workers hanging in harness

02 March 2007
Roger H Smith
Add a comment


Roger H Smith of Leading Edge emphasises the importance of thorough rescue planning for workers left hanging in harness

Planning for rescue and emergencies when employees work at height is a legal and moral responsibility for all employers. Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 obliges employers to ensure all work at height is properly planned, and Regulation 4(2) notes that "planning of work includes planning for emergencies and rescue".

Often we think of rescue as simply a matter of dialing 999, but calling the local fire brigade does not add up to an effective rescue programme. Response times can be too long and not all brigades have the capability to rescue people from height.

Even in the most safety-conscious employers' workplaces accidents happen, so a rescue plan is an essential component of working at height and should be managed via a working at height method statement and risk assessment, and be ingrained through training and practice.

The lack of any form of post-fall rescue plan - relying on employees improvising to rescue a colleague - not only puts the victim at risk, but also puts rescuers in harm's way. Unplanned attempts at rescue often result in secondary and tertiary injuries or fatalities.

Time is tight

The reason planned rescue by trained people is so important is that the danger is far from over when the fall arrest equipment does its job. Anyone hanging in a harness is at risk of suspension trauma; the blood drains from the top half of their body, depriving the brain of oxygen. The critical thing is to get them out of danger as soon as possible  - any more than 10 minutes in suspension and the risk of irreparable damage increases rapidly (see Dying in harness, HSW February 2006).

The safest form of rescue is self rescue by employees who remain conscious after a fall, where their equipment allows them to get to safety. Workers must be trained and practised in self rescue.

But even where a fallen worker appears to be able to help themselves, the plan must require colleagues to act as though they are incapable, since the situation might change rapidly and time is at a premium.

The plan must give clear direction that anyone who witnesses a fall should know who on site at the time is responsible for rescue and to alert them immediately, plus the emergency services where available. This means ensuring every worker has emergency phone numbers to hand, knows the site location to direct third parties and where to find the rescue kit.

The plan must set out the hierarchy of rescue options available on site for getting employees to safety - from dedicated rescue equipment, such as  controlled descent devices or winches, to access using work equipment such as mobile elevating work platforms (MEWPs) (see page 32) - plus locations of first-aid equipment and any rescue-specific items.

Though speed is of the essence, the plan must make co-workers' responsibilities clear and emphasise the importance of not endangering themselves in the course of the rescue.

Death by rescue

As the casualty is removed from suspension, another critical phase begins. The plan must ensure all staff know that usual first-aid procedures do not apply and the fallen worker must not be laid flat because of the risk of stale blood pooled in the legs rushing back through the body, poisoning their major organs and causing potentially fatal toxic shock syndrome. The plan must ensure all workers know to put the casualty into a sitting "W" position with their legs bent, unless they are suspected of having a spinal injury -where anyone falls more than 2m rescuers should suspect spinal damage.

Other considerations for a plan include how to ensure any wreckage/equipment is set aside to help later investigation; allowing for unusual structural features that might complicate a rescue; and ensuring guidance materials are translated where large numbers of migrant workers are on site.

However well thought out, a rescue plan (like a risk assessment) is useless if it is filed away and forgotten. You need to ensure that everyone who could be involved in a rescue - managers, supervisors and workers - is fully trained in the types of situation that might call for a rescue, what their roles are and how to use the equipment you provide. Rescue operations are carried out under extreme pressure; your employees' training  will determine how they react.

The training should be kept topped up with regular practice sessions or drills, keeping employees on their toes but also checking they can act inside the necessary five-minute window. Just as the plan needs updating with any change of circumstances, personnel or equipment, so does the training.

Leading Edge supplies work-at-height safety equipment and training (www.leadingedgesupplies.com). Leading Edge has published an 82-page hardback book on rescue guidance and equipment, available free of charge (also available on CD). For a copy, tel 01329 827997


Categories:
Construction, Work at height, Article, Work equipment
Bookmark this article with:

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
 
  • Log in to view and post comments
  • Printer-friendly version


Five steps debate

Duncan Spencer's recent article in HSW questioning the utility of the HSE's five steps to risk assessment method has prompted a discussion between Spencer and consultant John Anderson.

Read the debate and add your comments >>

Latest comments


Fines: profit over insurance

A day with the HSE

Should there be a register for consultants?

Isn't this what COSHH legislation is in place for?

One-in-three back pain sufferers blames work

Lord Young's safety review

Latest in the blog


Busman's holiday >>

The not-so-perfect CV >>

How to divine the significant from the
trivial >>

Britain v Germany...again >>

Do not touch! >>

Mastering the art of relaxation >>

Forthcoming events


15-16 September: Health and Safety '10 – Scotland

22 September: FLTA Safety Conference


13-14 October: Health and Safety ’10 – North

4 November: HSW/IIRSM conference 2010

See all >>

Ask a recruitment expert


I'm currently working in the UK. How do I go about securing work in the Middle East?

This is a common question, though the answer today is very different to the answer 18 months or two years ago... read more

My employer is prepared to support my professional development. I’m already CMIOSH and MIIRSM, what should I do next?

Firstly, congratulations. The fact your current company is prepared to support you beyond... read more

I've been made redundant. What else can I do to find a job?

Unfortunately, as you'll no doubt appreciate, there are lots of people in your position at the moment. There are fewer... read more

Click here for tips on how to write a
winning CV >>

Links


1st Degree-level course directory

Industry case studies

Products and services

Find your next job here

HSW on Facebook

HSW on Twitter

Lawyerlocator.com
Search For A Lawyer by town:

Powered by Lawyer Locator
Ask a question or post an answer >>


Follow healthandsafety on Twitter
Follow HSW on Facebook
  • Read current issue
  • Contact us
  • Subscribe
What do you think?










Health
Asbestos
Chemicals (and COSHH)
Disability Discrimination Act
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal disorders
Noise
Sickness absence
Stress/bullying
Vibration
Asthma
Display Screen Equipment (DSE)
Drugs and alcohol
Risk assessment
Legionnaire's disease
Accident reduction
Enforcement (prosecutions)
Mental health
New and expectant mothers
Older workers
Safe systems of work
Smoking
Safety
Directors' duties
Fire
HSE
Manual handling
Noise
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Risk assessment
Road safety
Work at height
Electrical safety
Lifting operations
Safe systems of work
Chemicals (and COSHH)
Corporate manslaughter
Migrant workers
Regulation
Asbestos
Confined spaces
Accident reduction
Worker involvement / representation
Violence at work
Workplace transport
Slips, trips, and falls
Work equipment
New and expectant mothers
Training
Insurance
Emergency planning
Lone workers
Enforcement (prosecutions)
First aid
Drugs and alcohol
Accident reporting / RIDDOR
Young workers
Professional Skills
Ask the recruitment expert
Management skills
Qualifications
Training
Training guides
Industry
Catering and leisure
Chemicals
Construction
Public services
Retail and distribution
Transport
Utilities
Financial / general services
Manufacturing / engineering

Halsbury House, 35 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1EL
Customer Services 0845 370 1234

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Reprint and Syndication
  • © Lexis Nexis. All Rights Reserved.

  • Partner sites:   LexisNexis
  • Magazines and Journals
  • Conferences and Training
  • Supplier Directory
  • Taxation Jobs
  • Taxation
  • Criminal Law & Justice
  • Legal Jobs
  • Company Law Forum
  • Health and Safety
  • Health and Safety Jobs
  • Environment in Business
  • Green & Environment Jobs
  • Payrolls & Pension Jobs
  • Employment Law Forum
  • www.newlaw-directories.co.uk