HSP
  • Home
  • Contact us
  • E-newsletter
  • Events
  • Take a free trial
  • Subscribe
  • Petition
  • Health
    • Asbestos
    • Chemicals (and COSHH)
    • Disability Discrimination Act
    • Ergonomics
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Noise
    • Sickness absence
    • Stress/bullying
  • Safety
    • Directors' duties
    • Fire
    • HSE
    • Manual handling
    • Noise
    • Personal protective equipment (PPE)
    • Risk assessment
    • Road safety
    • Work at height
  • Professional Skills
    • Ask the recruitment expert
    • Management skills
    • Qualifications
    • Training
    • Training guides
  • Industry
    • Catering and leisure
    • Chemicals
    • Construction
    • Public services
    • Retail and distribution
  • Sign In
Behind the wheel

06 March 2009
Jon Abbott
Add a comment


Jon Abbott says that in-car training is the obvious way to coach your higher-risk drivers.

In-vehicle driver training is universally recognised as the single most effective way to reduce driving incidents. It's a costly option to offer to all work drivers, but it's the best way to discharge your duty of care to employees whose risk profile (following a risk assessment) shows they need additional training, and to other road users who will cross their paths.

In-vehicle driver training is designed to ensure that drivers have greater hazard and risk perception to reduce their vulnerability to accidents, as well as to examine specific areas of driving skill and tackle any areas of concern to the trainer and to the driver.

There are a myriad of courses on offer, and companies often sign in-car driver training agreements without knowing exactly what they want. An in-car driver training course shouldn't actually start in a car. It should start with the employer sitting down and setting objectives for the training. Is it enough simply to reduce accidents among your travelling workforce? Or should you be thinking in a more preventative mode? Have you analysed the company accident history? And, more importantly, analysed why there is that history?

Targeting the most vulnerable drivers (before incidents occur) should be a key objective at the risk-assessment stage. And when incidents do occur, you should analyse them with one eye on how the results can be fed into a driver training programme.

A good training provider should be willing to work with you using this information to tailor a programme to your objectives. 

Good fit

Reputable in-car training providers recommend (where possible) that the courses are carried out on a one-to-one basis. If you can find someone who offers a lower-cost model, with multiple employees in a training car together, for example, you are likely to find the results are not as good. 

The training shouldn't stop there. If sound investment is made against a carefully crafted set of objectives, then the results should be measured and then the findings implemented moving forward. The idea of prevention is often omitted from training programmes.

Typically, an ideal in-vehicle driver training course will comprise some or all of the following elements: 

  • licence, eyesight and vehicle checks
  • an introduction to safer driving and its benefits to the individual, the employer and society in general
  • concentration, observation and hazard anticipation
  • the system of vehicle control, including best fuel efficiency
  • specific solutions matched to the experience of the company - for example manoeuvring, reversing and parking accidents, which are typically the most commonplace
  • the principles of skid avoidance and skid correction
  • an assessment of each driver's ability
  • individual training for each driver, according to their risk assessment
  • a full debriefing at the end of each session to provide guidance and advice, referring back to the individual's risk profile
  • a comprehensive printed report for the company, including each individual driver's personal development plan
  • a certificate of attendance for each trainee.

Safer driving techniques can have additional benefits for the company: more fuel-efficient driving can help with lowering CO2 emissions, cutting costs and reducing the corporate carbon footprint at the same time.

By considering an end-to-end solution for the safety of staff on the road, companies should be considering prevention as well as reactionary methods.  In-car driver training is key in reducing road risk and saving lives.

Jon Abbott is sales director at Cardinus Fleet Risk Management, which supplies fleet risk solutions to major fleet clients throughout the UK.


Categories:
Road safety, Training, Transport, Article, Training
Bookmark this article with:

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
 
  • Log in to view and post comments
  • Printer-friendly version


Ask a recruitment expert


I'm currently working in the UK. How do I go about securing work in the Middle East?

This is a common question, though the answer today is very different to the answer 18 months or two years ago... read more

My employer is prepared to support my professional development. I’m already CMIOSH and MIIRSM, what should I do next?

Firstly, congratulations. The fact your current company is prepared to support you beyond... read more

I've been made redundant. What else can I do to find a job?

Unfortunately, as you'll no doubt appreciate, there are lots of people in your position at the moment. There are fewer... read more

Click here for tips on how to write a
winning CV >>

Diary of a jobseeker


Dividing the significant from the trivial >>

Britain v Germany...again >>

Do not touch! >>

Mastering the art of relaxation >>

My long-term strategy >>

Forthcoming events


15-16 September: Health and Safety '10 – Scotland

22 September: FLTA Safety Conference


13-14 October: Health and Safety ’10 – North

HSW/IIRSM conference 2010

See all >>

Links


1st Degree-level course directory

Industry case studies

Products and services

Find your next job here

HSW on Facebook

HSW on Twitter

Lawyerlocator.com
Search For A Lawyer by town:

Powered by Lawyer Locator


Follow healthandsafety on Twitter
Follow HSW on Facebook
August 2010 issues
  • Read current issue
  • Contact us
  • Subscribe
What do you think?










Health
Asbestos
Chemicals (and COSHH)
Disability Discrimination Act
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal disorders
Noise
Sickness absence
Stress/bullying
Vibration
Asthma
Display Screen Equipment (DSE)
Drugs and alcohol
Risk assessment
Legionnaire's disease
Accident reduction
Enforcement (prosecutions)
Mental health
New and expectant mothers
Older workers
Safe systems of work
Smoking
Safety
Directors' duties
Fire
HSE
Manual handling
Noise
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Risk assessment
Road safety
Work at height
Electrical safety
Lifting operations
Safe systems of work
Chemicals (and COSHH)
Corporate manslaughter
Migrant workers
Regulation
Asbestos
Confined spaces
Accident reduction
Worker involvement / representation
Violence at work
Workplace transport
Slips, trips, and falls
Work equipment
New and expectant mothers
Training
Insurance
Emergency planning
Lone workers
Enforcement (prosecutions)
First aid
Drugs and alcohol
Accident reporting / RIDDOR
Young workers
Professional Skills
Ask the recruitment expert
Management skills
Qualifications
Training
Training guides
Industry
Catering and leisure
Chemicals
Construction
Public services
Retail and distribution
Transport
Utilities
Financial / general services
Manufacturing / engineering

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Reprint and Syndication
  • © Lexis Nexis. All Rights Reserved.

  • Partner sites:   LexisNexis
  • Magazines and Journals
  • Conferences and Training
  • Supplier Directory
  • Taxation Jobs
  • Taxation
  • Criminal Law & Justice
  • Legal Jobs
  • Company Law Forum
  • Health and Safety
  • Health and Safety Jobs
  • Environment in Business
  • Green & Environment Jobs
  • Payrolls & Pension Jobs
  • Employment Law Forum
  • www.newlaw-directories.co.uk