HSP
  • Home
  • Events
  • Product Book
  • Industry Case Studies
  • Subscribe
  • Contact us
  • Petition
  • Health
    • Asbestos
    • Chemicals (and COSHH)
    • Disability Discrimination Act
    • Ergonomics
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Noise
    • Sickness absence
    • Stress/bullying
  • Safety
    • Directors' duties
    • HSE
    • Personal protective equipment (PPE)
    • Work at height
  • Professional Skills
    • Ask the recruitment expert
    • Management skills
    • Qualifications
    • Training
    • Training guides
  • Industry
    • Catering and leisure
    • Chemicals
    • Construction
    • Public services
    • Retail and distribution
  • E-Newsletter
Forklift reversed over fitter

05 June 2009
Sasha Wood

Corby Magistrates' Court has demanded that construction company BAM pay a £28,540 penalty for traffic management failures that led to a forklift truck running over a subcontractor at a new £22.5 million shopping complex in Corby, Northamptonshire.

The fitter's firm, Pyrotect, had been subcontracted by BAM Construction to install a fire protection system at the shopping centre. He was crossing the mall area carrying a piece of plasterboard and walking away from the forklift when it suddenly reversed, hitting him from behind.

The forklift driver didn't see the worker and thought he had backed the truck onto a piece of fallen plasterboard. But when he got out of the truck to investigate, he found the worker beneath the plasterboard.

The subcontractor suffered multiple leg injuries and was rushed to hospital for surgery. Two years after the accident, he is still unable to return to work.

"BAM are one of the big players in the construction field and we would expect better," said HSE inspector Mhairi Lockwood, "especially as they have been advised previously on workplace transport at this site."

Lockwood said the HSE investigation showed that BAM had traffic management policies, but the company had failed to maintain and review traffic routes to ensure they were adhered to throughout the project.

She said all companies must assess the risks and take precautions when pedestrians and vehicles work in close proximity.

At a Corby magistrates hearing, BAM pleaded guilty to breaking Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act, by failing to ensure a subcontractor's safety. The company was fined £15,000 and ordered to pay £13,540 in HSE costs.


Categories:
HSE, Enforcement (prosecutions), Prosecutions, Enforcement (prosecutions), Workplace transport

Bookmark this article with:

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati


Share this page

Printer-friendly version



  • Most read
  • Emailed
  • Making light work
  • Forum pledges less construction bureaucracy
  • Veolia worker killed by falling bin
  • TUC reignites temperature debate
  • HSE adds new sample risk assessments
  • Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act
  • Food Safety Act 1990
  • Control of Noise at Work Regulations
  • Safely laundering protective clothing
  • Stress buster
Latest News
RSS
Government launches new wellbeing tool
Minister resists extending RIDDOR to work-related road injuries
HSE calls on industry to improve safety alerts
Rail regulator raises Network Rail maintenance fears
Employers urged to sign up to new MSD charter
First corporate manslaughter trial delayed
What do you think?
Latest Articles
RSS
Multiplication game
British Sugar gets personal
Focus on careers: nerve tonic
Business
Industry Case Studies
Products and services
Find your next job here
2009 course directory
Events
RSS
17 March 2010: Managing a Healthy Workplace
23 March 2010: Butterworths Corporate Manslaughter course - Birmingham
25 March 25, 2010: Oil and Gas Technology Forum Drilling Day
Latest Jobs
RSS
Health And Safety Trainers Needed For Major Saudi Oil Company
Head Of Occupational Health & Environmental Safety
H&s Manager
Interim Health And Safety Manager
Uk H&s Manager - London


HSW April 2010
  • Read current issue
  • Contact us
  • Subscribe










    HealthSafetyProfessional SkillsIndustry
    Asbestos
    Chemicals (and COSHH)
    Disability Discrimination Act
    Ergonomics
    Musculoskeletal disorders
    Noise
    Sickness absence
    Stress/bullying
    Vibration
    Asthma
    Display Screen Equipment (DSE)
    Drugs and alcohol
    Risk assessment
    Legionnaire's disease
    Accident reduction
    Enforcement (prosecutions)
    Mental health
    New and expectant mothers
    Older workers
    Safe systems of work
    Smoking
    Fire
    Directors' duties
    HSE
    Personal protective equipment (PPE)
    Work at height
    Road safety
    Risk assessment
    Corporate manslaughter
    Chemicals (and COSHH)
    Electrical safety
    Lifting operations
    Migrant workers
    Regulation
    Asbestos
    Confined spaces
    Accident reduction
    Accident reporting / RIDDOR
    First aid
    Safe systems of work
    Drugs and alcohol
    Emergency planning
    Enforcement (prosecutions)
    Insurance
    Lone workers
    Manual handling
    New and expectant mothers
    Noise
    Slips, trips, and falls
    Training
    Violence at work
    Work equipment
    Worker involvement / representation
    Workplace transport
    Young workers
    Ask the recruitment expert
    Management skills
    Qualifications
    Training
    Training guides
    Catering and leisure
    Chemicals
    Construction
    Public services
    Retail and distribution
    Transport
    Utilities
    Financial / general services
    Manufacturing / engineering

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Reprint and Syndication
  • © Lexis Nexis. All Rights Reserved.

  • Partner sites:   LexisNexis
  • Magazines and Journals
  • Conferences and Training
  • Supplier Directory
  • Taxation Jobs
  • Taxation
  • Legal Jobs
  • Company Law Forum
  • Health and Safety
  • Health and Safety Jobs
  • Environment in Business
  • Green & Environment Jobs
  • Payrolls & Pension Jobs
  • Employment Law Forum
  • www.newlaw-directories.co.uk